Governance Landscape
Three Pillars. One Framework.
The NCAA, the College Sports Commission, and the CFGC each serve distinct, complementary roles in the modern governance of college football.
The Three-Pillar Model
Complementary Governance
NCAA
National Eligibility & Major Infractions
National eligibility rules, amateurism standards, and major infractions. Chronically understaffed with 18–36 month case timelines.
College Sports Commission
House v. NCAA Settlement Administration
Administers the House v. NCAA settlement including $20.5M revenue-sharing framework and NIL clearinghouse. Clear, narrow scope defined by federal court order.
CFGC
Cross-Conference Enforcement & Market Integrity
Cross-conference enforcement, coaching and NIL market integrity, neutral arbitration. Purpose-built for speed and complexity.
The Structural Problem
Why Conferences Cannot Self-Police Cross-Conference Disputes
Conferences exist to serve their member institutions. That purpose — legitimate and necessary — creates an inherent limitation: no conference can impartially investigate a dispute between one of its own members and an institution from another conference.
This is not a failure of character. It is an architectural limitation. A conference that investigates and sanctions its own member in a cross-conference dispute faces inevitable questions of bias, competitive motivation, and institutional loyalty. A conference that investigates a non-member institution faces questions of jurisdiction and authority.
The CFGC was designed specifically to resolve this structural problem — providing neutral, credible, and authoritative cross-conference enforcement that no individual conference can deliver.
Coordination
Coordination Protocols
The CFGC maintains formal information-sharing agreements with the NCAA Enforcement Division and the College Sports Commission. These protocols ensure shared intelligence, coordinated investigations where jurisdiction overlaps, and the elimination of duplicative enforcement actions.
The goal is not competition between governance bodies. It is comprehensive coverage — ensuring that no governance gap exists between the institutions responsible for protecting the integrity of college football.
Complete Governance Requires Independent Enforcement.
Learn how the CFGC transfers legal, reputational, and operational risk away from conferences.